During the committee`s deliberations, the British government endorsed the report`s recommendations on term termination, independence and Jewish immigration. [Citation needed] However, the British felt “unable to implement an agreement” unless it was acceptable to both Arabs and Jews, and asked the General Assembly to provide another implementing authority if it did. Some Jewish organizations also rejected the proposal. Irgun leader Menachem Begin announced: “The division of the homeland is illegal. It will never be detected. The signing of the sharing agreement by institutions and individuals is not valid. This will not bind the Jewish people. Jerusalem was and will always be our capital. Eretz Israel will be returned to the people of Israel. All.
And forever. These views have been publicly rejected by the majority of the emerging Jewish state. . The Jewish Agency, the Jewish state, accepted the plan, and almost all Jews in Palestine rejoiced at the news. Haj Amin al-Husseini told an interviewer for Jaffa`s Al Sari daily in March 1948 that the Arabs not only intended to prevent partition, but “would continue to fight until the Zionists were annihilated.” [115] Asia-Pacific (9 countries, mainly the Middle East sub-region): Analyzed by the modern composition of what later became known as United Nations regional groups, the final vote showed a relatively coordinated voting style. However, this does not reflect the regional grouping of the time, as a complete reshuffle of the regional grouping took place in 1966. All Western countries voted in favour of the resolution, with the exception of the United Kingdom (the mandate holder), Greece and Turkey. The Soviet bloc also voted for partition, with the exception of Yugoslavia, which was to be expelled from the cominform the following year. The majority of Latin American countries that followed Brazil`s leadership voted in favor of partition, with a significant minority abstaining. Asian countries (especially Middle Eastern countries) voted against partition, with the exception of the Philippines.
[94] The Israelis managed to repel the Arabs and then conquer key areas such as the Galilee, the Palestinian coast, and a strip of territory that connected the coastal region to the western part of Jerusalem. In 1949, UN-brokered ceasefires left permanent control of these conquered territories to the State of Israel. The departure of hundreds of thousands of Palestinian Arabs from Israel during the war left the country with a Jewish majority. Subcommittee 2, set up on 23 October 1947 to draw up a detailed plan on the basis of the proposals of the Arab States, presented its report within a few weeks. [57] A request for an opinion from the General Assembly, resolution ES-10/14 (2004), explicitly cited resolution 181(II) as a “relevant resolution” and questioned the International Court of Justice (ICJ) about the legal consequences of the relevant Security Council and General Assembly resolutions. Judge Abdul Koroma expressed the majority opinion: “The Court also ruled that the right to self-determination is a right established and recognized under international law for the Palestinian territory and people. Accordingly, the exercise of that right entitles the Palestinian people to their own State, as originally provided for in resolution 181 (II) and later confirmed. [152] In response, Professor Paul De Waart stated that the Court had once and for all questioned the legality of the 1922 Palestinian mandate of the League of Nations and the 1947 UN partition plan.
[153] The plan would have provided the following demographic data (data based on 1945). The Jewish Agency expressed support for most of UNSCOP`s recommendations, but stressed the “intense urge” of the overwhelming majority of displaced Jews to travel to Palestine. The Jewish Agency criticized the proposed borders, particularly in the Western Galilee and West Jerusalem (outside the Old City), arguing that they should be incorporated into the Jewish state. However, they agreed to accept the plan if it “allowed for the immediate restoration of the Jewish state with sovereign control over its own immigration.” On 3 September 1947, the Committee reported to the General Assembly. CHAPTER V: PROPOSALS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS (I), Section A of the report contained eleven proposals for recommendations (I – XI), which were adopted unanimously. Section B contained a proposal for a recommendation, which was adopted by a large majority and dealt with the Jewish problem in general (XI). CHAPTER VI: PROPOSALS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS (II) contained a plan for division with the Economic Union, which was approved by seven members of the Committee (Canada, Czechoslovakia, Guatemala, Netherlands, Peru, Sweden and Uruguay). CHAPTER VII RECOMMENDATIONS (III)” contained a comprehensive proposal on which three members (India, Iran and Yugoslavia) had voted and supported a State of Palestine. .